調查員

米斯卡塔尼克. 學者

探求者
  • 2
  • 4
  • 2
  • 4
__Health: 6. __Sanity: 8.

你以磁通量穩定器 (關閉)面朝上開始遊戲。

:將1個線索從凱特‧溫斯羅普上移動到你控制的一張上面沒有線索的科學工具支援卡上。

強制 - 在你控制的一張上面有線索的支援卡離場時:將其線索放置在你所在地點上。

效果:+0。你可以將1個線索從你控制的支援卡上移動回凱特‧溫斯羅普上。

Cristi Balanescu
The Feast of Hemlock Vale Investigator Expansion #4.

凱特‧溫斯羅普 - __Back

調查員

牌組卡牌張數:30。

牌組構建選項:探求者卡牌()等級0-5,科學卡牌等級0-4,洞察卡牌等級0-1,中立卡牌等級0-5。

牌組構建需求(不計入卡牌張數):磁通量穩定器、實驗失敗、1張隨機基礎弱點。

凱特‧溫斯羅普長年待在米斯卡尼克大學的科學大樓中,在地下室埋首研究。她對贊助跟學術聲譽都沒有興趣,只專注在自己的研究上。最後她的專心致志終於開花結果,她發明了磁通量穩定器:能引導新型能量的強力裝置。但是,進步是要付出代價的。這項劃時代發明的首次成功實驗中奪走了她的好友兼導師楊教授的生命。自從那時開始,凱特不知疲倦地持續研究,了解更多關於這股外星能量的知識。希望某天能找到逆轉這一切的辦法。
凱特‧溫斯羅普
凱特‧溫斯羅普

FAQs

(from the official FAQ or responses to the official rules question form)
  • Q: As Kate Winthrop, can I spend clues that I place on my assets? A: Yes. Kate Winthrop controls all clues placed on assets she controls, and may spend or remove those clues just like any other investigator. For example, she can spend clues on her assets to advance the Act deck, or place clues from those assets on her location when she reveals he signature weakness, Failed Experiment. Keep in mind that due to Kate's Forced ability, when an asset you control with clues on it leaves play, you must place those clues on your location. (Feast of Hemlock Vale FAQ, February 2024)
Last updated

Reviews

FoHV has been out for a month and still no reviews, so here's my description from my "One for All" series of decks that has a similar breakdown for each investigator:

At first glance Kate looks pretty complex, and she kind of is! If you boil her ability down it looks like this: put your clues on your tool and science cards for a +2 boost to any skill. One clue per card. You can still spend the clues, but if you find your other signature card, you can put the used clues back on your investigator for more boosts. This make her quite flexible, especially by Seeker standards, and she performs well with or without teammates around. If you want a clue focused investigator that has an answer for most situations and loves playing assets, Kate is your girl!

Her reliance on assets can also be a liability, as she needs some setup time before she really gets going. Scenarios that require you to hit the ground running, or even some bad early draws can really put the hurt on poor Kate. It's not a bad idea to have a few tricks up your sleeve that might prevent an overwhelming start. Her signature weakness also has some major potential to cause trouble, so be ready to give yourself a little willpower boost at a moment's notice.

Some archetypes that work well for this template:

The Scientist - Here's a formula for you: Tool / Science cards + tutoring / card draw + funding for both = Progress! Dedicating majority of your deck space to the aforementioned items should result in a fairly self-sustaining investigative engine, and not only does bonus card draw help you find your assets faster, it also helps dig for your Aetheric Current! Huzzah!

Precision Success - "Succeed by" cards aren't just for Rogues any more! Kate comes included with a number of cards that grant bonuses if you manage to over-succeed by a specific amount, and this pairs well with her ability to grant on-demand skill boosts if you're paying attention to what the likeliest token modifiers are. Seekers don't have a lot of options for token manipulation, but if you have a Mystic friend, there is a tonne of potential here!

Full Flex - Once Kate gets her gear set up, she can be remarkably self-sufficient. Static foot boosts, evasion bonuses, and cards that allow Kate to get out of trouble if she gets overwhelmed early on will help her get fully online without needing a babysitter for the first half of the scenario.

Clue Drop - I don't personally have the card sets to pull this off, but this is a great archetype for Kate if you have most of the newer investigator cards. Dropping clues from your assets allows you to use your powerful ability even more often, so grab cards that enable drops, and that grant benefits for doing so.

EzieBaikUben · 434
I houserule that "Scientific Theory" is Science. — MrGoldbee · 1402
Right?! We need a taboo list for traits — EzieBaikUben · 434