Unless I'm missing something, even George would prefer Nothing Left to Lose most of the time.
This requires waiting to accumulate supplies (starts with 2, but the other can give up to 5). That's not great if you need the money now.
Nothing Left to Lose also gives card draw, which George usually can take advantage of.
This costs one resource, for a card that you use when you're short on resources.
Nothing Left to Lose has a ? symbol in case you don't need it when you get it. (Marginal benefit, but it's there).
Pro: this can be re-used, when you re-shuffle your deck, I guess.
1 less xp here, even though survivors usually have extra xp laying around.
Maybe an insurance for Preston, as a way to easily deal with his weakness, or in general to save resources for later since they go directly to your pool. I don't see him discarding a lot of cards, though...
—
AlderSign
· 407
It's hard to even justify using it for that role in a Preston deck when Investments exists; are you really going to be discarding more than one card a round?
—
Thatwasademo
· 58
er uh wait this card exhausts to add a supply anyway so welp
—
Thatwasademo
· 58
Yeah, it's bad :(
—
AlderSign
· 407
Seems like it could be good with Yorick; even without discarding it goes Resource positive. Could combine it with Glimmer of Hope and a discard outlet for some kind of synergy? It'd be a lot nicer if it wasn't limited to 1 per Investigator.
—
ClassyD
· 1
For George, I agree you should get Nothing Left to Lose first. For me, I think Ample Supplies is still good that you may want it, especially if your running Forced Learning since you want some redundancy.
—
tactis
· 18
Yeah, but the exhaust really hurts.
—
AlderSign
· 407