場景. Stage 2

神話
__Clues: –
你必須找到回去的路。既然伊斯人能夠帶你來到這裡,那肯定也有回去的辦法……

目標 - 如果以下情況中,有三種情況已發生,你必須推進場景:

- 有調查員"找到了歸位程式"。

- 有調查員"解剖了一個器官"。

- 有調查員"進行了一次會談"。

- 有調查員"發現了現在的年份"。

- 有調查員"啟動了設備"。

- 有調查員控制了看管人。

Stephen Somers
天機之城 #242. 天機之城 #6.

歸位程式 - __Back

場景
你深信你已找到了伊斯人將你傳送到這裡的程式。但事實令人難以接受。你的身體從未被帶到這裡來。你的意識已被轉移到這具身體中,屬於這群生物的其中一個同胞。在其他的某個地方——在某個時空——這群該死的生物中的一員就居住在你的身體中。

你再也不必執行以下任何任務。

但是,你在本場冒險結束之前執行的任務越多,就越容易能轉移到你的人類身體中,這項程式失敗或產生反作用的機率也更低。但要當心……

將本場景放進勝利牌區,以本面朝上放置,作為提醒。

- 有調查員"找到了歸位程式"。

- 有調查員"解剖了一個器官"。

- 有調查員"進行了一次會談"。

- 有調查員"發現了現在的年份"。

- 有調查員"啟動了設備"。

- 有調查員控制了看管人。

禁止通行
禁止通行

FAQs

No faqs yet for this card.

Reviews

This is a question as opposed to a review: suppose an investigator controlled the custodian and then lost control of it in Act 3a. Then for the purpose of Act 2b (and the scenario resolution), is it true that the investigator "has performed" the "An investigator controls the Custodian?"

To be clear, I think this is different from Act 2a, where it states "if three of the following are true..." and when you lose control, it is no longer true that you "have control". However, given the way the game resolves the number of tasks in the resolution of the scenario, it seems it expects the number of tasks you have "performed by the time the scenario ends" (as opposed to, say "to be true by the time the scenario ends") to be definitely between 3 and 6, and you can get into a state where you only have 2 tasks (by doing the Custodian and 2 other tasks, then losing the custodian), which is not given a consequence in the resolution.

krzhang · 7
You'd have to control the custodian at time of resolution; the text isn't in quotes so it's not asking you to remember something, it's just looking at the game state. It should say, roughly, "the more of the following that are true, the better..." but it seems to have slipped under QA's nets. — SGPrometheus · 745
I agree with SGPrometheus; you need control when all payers reach the “resign” condition. — LivefromBenefitSt · 1022
That seems to be right to me as well but like the OP said , it does create a new hole in the rules in the resolution. If you advance from Act 2a to 2b with control of the Custodian and two other things , lose control of the Custodian in Act 3 and don't complete any other tasks by the time you resign then you end up with 2 tasks completed in the resolution and no instructions for what to do. And yeah, I also kinda think that suggests the intent was for it not to be possible to "un-do" the tasks....Might be worth asking over — bee123 · 25
I'd just go for the 3 tasks completed bullet; it doesn't get much worse than that anyway :p — SGPrometheus · 745
hehe I do agree with that! I still hold that if we are going to take cards to their word though, we would incentivize minmax players to go for the 2 tasks instead of the 3 to dodge a ‘ — krzhang · 7
(argh misclick) “better” outcome, so an errata would be nice. — krzhang · 7